Quote:
Originally Posted by studio1one
Gloablsources is also a wholesale marketplace and if you buy something from a verified source on Globalsources you pretty much know you won't be scammed, especially if they have 3 or 4 stars. In fact I would bet my house on any globalsources 4 star supplier not ripping you off. Sure quality may be poor, delivery may be slow or whatever but you WILL get your goods from them. this is because their verification systems are extremely robust and everyone knows what is done. I use globalsources more than any other place to find my suppliers.... why? because of the trust I place in their systems.
|
With all due respect, I think you are mixing apples with oranges to a certain extent. Global Sources are a multi-million pound company with over 2,500 employees located across 69 offices around the world, they have also been in business
since 1971. It is their business to verify suppliers, they guarantee it and are a market leader in global trade. They have earned that right. They have perfected their verification systems over the best part of 40 years and spend millions on their verification services each and every year. The amount they spend is justified by their trade community, currently standing at over 195,000 suppliers and over 800,000 buyers.
I totally appreciate the point you are making (in terms of entrusting the marketplace) but to compare our service with a market leader, backed with huge economies of scale is not only unrealistic but also a little unfair. You cannot compare one service with another and expect your point to be totally valid. The same is true with PayPal and eBay who have come up in this conversation, the difference between those companies and this business is vast. This goes back to the point I made earlier in this thread about suggestions being viable. Ultimately the amount of available investment and resources to this business cannot be compared to those multi-million (or billion in the case of eBay/PayPal) companies who spend serious money on perfecting their models.
The bottom line here is that we need a way of analysing trading history for our advertisers and to build better transparency with prospective buyers. On the outset, we can do this by introducing a profile for each and every advertiser where by their information is collected to form a sort of risk assessment. If this profile could then be made public to enable buyers to make more informed decisions over trading, that would go along way to solving our transparency issues. Buyers can then see who they are trading with and make their own judgements/verifications on top of the basic checks that we do prior to letting them loose on the marketplace.
Last edited by Anthony; 08-06-2009 at 09:39 AM.