Quote:
Originally Posted by ADC
Personally I would get it anyway, it's not worth the risk for a couple of hundred quid a year.
|
Ok but how exactly does this work. Do they simply issue insurance to you for any product you may sell, I find that hard to believe?
Basically what happens if you have different products in every week?
Or in the scenario of the op, every time the dropshipper adds new products he has to call up the insurance company and give details of each new product to them, and get his premium increased each time (more products = more risk)?
It just seem really odd to me that thats how it works. Why should they be able to decide whether they sue a retailer or a manufacturer?
I mean by that logic, the customer can also sue the wholesaler/distributor since they are the ones who sold faulty goods to the retailer, or the shipping company that brought it across from China because if they didnt, it would not have been on the UK market to start with.
The whole thing just seems ludicrous to me, it really does.
Yes the retailer can be held responsible/sued in certain situations, but they would generally fall outside of what a product liability insurance would cover (you know how they try everything they can to not cover in x situation/for x reason).
Ok fair enough if it cost you £200/£300 year like you say to have full cover for any situation that arises that does not specifically catalogue each individual product (so is a very generalised insurance - to you, the retailer - that covers any product you sell, no exceptions) then maybe it isn't as bad. I just cannot see an insurance company operating like that, as Tesco would pay the same premium as an ebay trader (for example).
And sorry, it turned into a bit of a rant too, it just seems that more and more things are put on the retailers shoulders while wholesalers, distributors, manufacturers don't have to answer to the same. If there is a defective product, it is no more the retailers fault than anyone else's in the chain. Yes someone should be responsible, but it should not always be the retailer (unless its by something they did).
I obviously don't know much about product liability insurance specifically, so I don't mean to come across arrogant or anything. Its just one of those things that ticked me off. I will have to look into this and maybe then it will make more sense to me, I just cant get my head around it at the moment.